dna.jpg

Constantina focuses her research on developing novel methods that are being used to establish a universal vertebrate gene nomenclature. Her project aims to revise the traditional gene nomenclature, that is based on outdated tools from the pre-genomic era. Back then, biochemists were naming genes based solely on their DNA sequence, in a way that small amino-acid changes between orthologous genes in different species led them to give them different names. As a result, scientists nowadays are still using different names for orthologous genes in different species or lineages, something that leads to great difficulties in translating findings across species. A great example is the oxytocin gene (and gene family), where for the same gene, oxytocin is used in mammals, mesotocin in birds, reptiles and frogs, isotocin, glumitocin and neurophysin-1 in different fish species, and aspargtocin in sharks, among others. {Figure Table} 

Constantina and colleagues decisively established in their Nature study that gene nomenclature should be based on synteny (the surrounding territory of a gene, what is outside of a gene), and not on gene identity (its nucleotide sequence, what is inside a gene). They set the genomic and phylogenetic criteria that a universal gene nomenclature should fulfill, introducing a set of novel genomic analyses. They applied these criteria on the oxytocin and vasotocin ligand and receptor family, paving the way for a revolutionary change in how scientists will understand and speak about genes across species. Constantina aims to use this method for the rest of the gene families with problematic nomenclature and for the first time establish a common language (nomenclature) for all scientists working on vertebrate species.  

Project Gallery

1/1